This freedom has advantage as it enables the individual to grow freely. Democracy thus offers favourable atmosphere for development of human personality. But democracy has its weaknesses, the greatest of which is that it may be the rule of ignorance.
The best men may thus fail to get elected. Elections are usually a matter of propaganda. However, the voters in countries like Britain and America have not proved so lacking in judgement as many of the opponents of democracy would have us believe, though it is true that in our own country the people being illiterates rarely give evidence of sound or independent judgement. Democracy is wanting in efficiency. For prompt and effective action, unity of action is essential.
In a multitude of minds, much unprofitable discussion takes place whereas unity of control is needed for a vigorous national life. According to Newman, for example, the British Government cannot cope with the emergencies created by war as effectively as a dictator can. This criticism, however, is not very convincing because in times of war the British Prime Minister usually wields the powers of a dictator. A sounder criticism of democracy in times of war would be to say that secrecy in military affairs becomes difficult, if not impossible, and that the opposition usually lowers the morale of people by its loud condemnation of the actions of the cabinet.
It was thought that the First World War had made the world safe for democracy, but this forecast proved to be wrong.
While democracy worked quite well in France and the English-speaking countries, most other countries swung towards dictatorship. So successful and powerful did their dictatorships become that the days of democracy seemed to be almost over.
Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Japan, Russia-in all these countries dictatorship triumphed and flourished, till the outbreak of another World War, greater than the first, plunged the world into bloody strife the like of which had never been witnessed before in history.
But dictatorship is certainly not without its merits. As Carlyle points out, society is an organism and not a machine. No mechanical system like the ballot-box can, therefore, prove satisfactory.
This safer course is to give all power to a dictator. The dictator must, of course, be one who has an exceptional ability to organize, direct and administer. Parliamentary rule usually means government by cliques of politicians whose purview is strictly limited by their private interests.
A dictator, on the other hand, can concentrate all his energies on the uplift and improvement of his country. This is borne out by the phenomenal success achieved by Hitler and Mussolini in their respective countries. Unfortunately, the methods of dictatorship are, and have to be, ruthless. Dictators normally need to do a number of things to put in place their dictatorships: Dictators will then need to prohibit or not allow political parties that oppose their rule. They will confiscate the political parties' property or offices and such things.
Dictators may suppress or persecute some religious groups or institutions. Dictators will also need to undo or close down democratic institutions such as parliament and in some cases the congress.
Some social organizations, such as civil rights groups, human rights organisations, legal aid centres, students' unions , teachers ' federations, trade or workers unions are also undone and those who persist with such activities may be killed. Dictators will normally rewrite an existing constitution or put in place a completely new one. This makes their power constitutional which then cannot be disputed.
Dictators then maintain their rule with state terrorism , which normally involves a secret police , death squads , random or night curfew , indefinite arrest without trial and a network of torture centres and concentration camps. Some dictatorships create a fictional or non existent internal inside their country enemy which they claim to be at war with to justify give reason for their use of much military violence against a whole unarmed population. A dictatorship that is ruled by soldiers is called a military dictatorship or junta.
An absolute monarchy the system where there are Kings and Queens who have full power over their country can be considered to be a dictatorship, but are usually not called dictators. A dictatorship is usually not liked by the people, because most don't like to be dictated around.
Most dictators are selfish and rule over the people just for power. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article does not have any sources.
Dictatorship essaysIn modern times, no dictator can take total power by force alone. In order to gain support, they must offer something beneficial to the people. Unfortunately what is thought to be beneficial can be extremely harmful and cruel.
Democracy Verses Dictatorship There are many groups of people in the world who stay in different countries, who have to work together. A leader will make decisions on behalf of the group.
Better Essays words | ( pages) | Preview Dictatorship in Pakistan - Although many people believe that democracy is the best and successful form of the government. Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Japan, Russia-in all these countries dictatorship triumphed and flourished, till the outbreak of another World War, greater than the first, plunged the world into bloody strife the like of which had never been witnessed before in history. But dictatorship is certainly not without its merits.
Achieve goal essay for an essay question,. Reply photo-essays; robert frost essays; the country s essay on democracy 1 the case study essay early resistance to grow up your credentials. T. Com! Dictatorship phd thesis on essays Feb 01, some papers detailing the friedensreich wrote: cabinet papers. Essay on Dictatorship System – The Dictatorship or Totalitarian system is one of the rivals of the democratic system. It is a system in which the total power is vested in one individual or party. It is popularly known as dictatorship.